A TRIBUTE TO SRI P.N. OAK
This Letter was written before he passed away on 4th December, 2007.
Mr. P.N. Oak. Austere by nature, a journalist by profession, a historian by hobby a researcher by accident and a freedom fighter by design Mr. Oak is one of his kind.
Born on March 2, 1917 at Indore (Cntral India) in a Maharashtrian Brahmin family he obtained his M.A. LLB Degrees from Mumbai University worked as a tutor in English at Fergussan College, Pune for a year and later joined the army got posted to Singapore at the age of 24.
He was one of the organizers of Indian national Army (INA) and a co-worker of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. After the end of world war II Oak walked back and hitch niped from Singapore to Dimapur in Assam.
From 1947 to 1974 his profession has been mainly journalism having worked on the editorial staff of Hindustan Times and The Statesman, as a class I officer in the Ministry of Information an Broadcasting (Govt. of India) and as Editor in American Embassy’s information service (USIS), all in New Delhi.
From 1963 onwards Mr. Oak has been putting out copious evidence through his research papers articles lectures slide chans and books proving that the historic mansions gardens, mosques, towers mansoleums and town ships ascribed to Moslems in India are in reality pre-moslem property belonging to and built by Hindu rulers.
Because of his hobby of visiting historic edifices it struck him as very odd that though muslims ruled India for over a thousand years ( 712 to 1857 A.D.) they are said to have raised mostly tombs and mosques, but no palaces. The other oddity in current history is that even native Indian ( Hindu) rulers for 7000 years from Pandavas to Prithviraj Chauhan are not known to have had many palaces of their own.
After years of concentrated thinking on those two enigmas it suddenly struck him that historic edifices throughout India tamtommed as tambs and mosques, could be captured, misused and misadvertised palaces and temples raised by Hindu rulers.
That inducd him to investigate further collect evidence and take a second harder look at historic edifices through out India which convinced him that his hypothesis was correct.
Thus, since he had discovered a great blunder in Indian history he wondered whether world history was faultless. And to his shock and surprise he discovered that world history too has numerous drawbacks.
For instance though there was no Islam before 622 A.D. none of the muslim countries throughout the world teaches any pre Islamic history of its region. Likewise no Christian country throughout the world teaches any pre-christian history.
These discoveries nudged him to found an organization which would teach the world of its (Pre-islamic and pre-christian) vedic Sanskrit heritage which held full sway throughout the world. He wrote several books braving the displeasure of his employers and the ruling Govt.
Charges of being communal were hurled at him. His books were banned from the library of parliament persecuted and prosecuted OAK faught his own case and was pronounced ‘not gulty’ by the court of law.
Supported by his family and friends he went ahead and founded the Institute for Rewriting Indian History which further grew to be The Institute for Rewriting world history.
Mr. OAK was invited for felicitation and lectures by various (N.G.O.) institutions and individuals. He traveled all over India and abroad and evoked great care from his readers and followers.
All his discoveries have so far remained unchallenged.
The Public Interest Petition/ Social Action litigation bearing Writ Petition No. 36818 of 2004 pending before Hon’ble Allahabad High court is sought to be transferred to the Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India in exercise of the powers Conferred with the Apex Court Under Article 139A of Constitution of India. This Writ Petition is filed in Public Interest on behalf of the Institute of re-writing Indian History through its Founder President, Shri P. N. Oak S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak R/o- Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune-411007 challenging the virus of The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 read with The Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951, replaced by The Ancient Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. This writ petition is further seeking the relief for appointing a facts finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Archeological Department regarding the historical blunder by recognising Taj Mahal as built by Shahjahan. This Writ Petition has not even dealt with by then Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. M. Katju and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sunil Ambwani , but referred to another Co-ordinate Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. B. S. Chauhan and Hon’ble Justice Mr. Dilip Gupta . Shri P. N. Oak, the Founder President, the Institute of re-writing Indian History was born on 2nd March 1917 at Indore and fought a battle of independence in associations with Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. He has got his faith report in our judicial institution for the protection of National Monuments of Taj Mahal, Agra Red Fort, Etmauddaula, Fatehpur Sikri from further destruction by adopting the device to hide Hindu religious symbols hidden inside two or three storey Red Stone Building Covered with the Earthly gardens from front side ;but fully exposed from its back side of Jamuna River side of this monument of great National Importance. This is now lying within the control of the Wakf Act,1995 by claiming the existence of Mosque inside these buildings. This is a glimpse of the picture coupled with preposition based on the evidence on the basis of the research work conducted by Sri P. N. Oak, Prof. R. Nath of Rajasthan University, Jaipur and further supported by Prof. Agam Prasad Mathur and Smt. Pratima Asthana, both of them are great historians and they are also former Vice- Chancellor of Agra University and Gorakhpur University respectively.
This is an endeavor by the great Indians, as history may not be thought to the children by deceptive mode of appeasement policy in favour of our so called Muslim Minority, which has resultant in division of the country and creating an insurgencies in Jammu and Kashmir and by inciting an attack on Parliament.
Advocates have to perform three fold duties at a time; i.e. duty to protect the legal interests of his Clients, to behave like the officers of the courts and also to protect the society from the atrocities committed in any form by the custodian of public Interest. The protection of the Fundamental Rights of Expression, Freedom Of Conscience, Faith and Religion of the Children undertaken their education in the subject of History with false identifications and ruthless invasions to their culture vedic heritage are one of the utmost importance to protect by Advocates by filing the Public Interest Litigation. Article 49 envisaged a duty to protect Ancient Monuments, which are repository to our tradition, culture, and architecture achievements. In this regard Shri P. N. Oak, through his research work conducted on the basis of historical evidences has proved that the glorious, marvelous seventh wonder of the world namely “ Taj Mahal” is a Hindu Temple/Palace constructed by Raja Parmarde Dev a Jat Ruler in 1155 to 1158 AD on behalf of Minister Salakahan, which remain in occupation of Raja Man Singh and thereafter taken over by Emperor Shahajahan from the possession of Raja Jai Singh in exchange of Government gratis on the death of Arjumanbano, Mumtaj Zeelani died on 17th June 1631 AD. The historical evidences in support of his research work are the admission of Mughal Emperor Shahajahan himself in his Badshahnama written by Shahjahan’s own court chronicler, Maula Abdul Hamid Lahori. The relevant description at Page no. 403 Vol.-1 of Badshanama admit the aforesaid revelation. The said document is now kept in National Archives, New Delhi. The second contemporary document is prince Aurangzabe’s letter written to his father in Persian language reporting the tomb-complex (Taj Mahal) being very old and ancient structure with cracks and leakage from it as early as in 1652 A.D. Which has been noticed by Archeological Survey of India. The third documentary evidences are Ex-Maharaja Jaipur Kapad Dwara collection bearing two Farmans written by Shahjahan on December 18, 1633 having modern exhibition no.R-176 and R-177 demanding Makrana Marble for Koranic grafts and the stone cutter for scaffolding Koranic scripts (after removing the Sanskrit verse disclosing the creation of the Shiva Temple). The entire structure is having octagonal chamber with spiritual meant for its tuning by beating Drums, blowing Crunch (Shanks), playing on Golden Thaal, Roaming the Bells , while worshiping in dedicated manner infront of 3 metre long Shivlingi. The remains of which have been discovered at Bateshwar Mela locality situated nearby to the location of Taj Mahal, which is described at Ingraphia Indica Vol-1 at Lucknow Museum. This crystal white Marvel Stone Shiva Temple was so alluring that Lord Shiva once enshrined in it has decided never to return to mount Khailash Parwat, which is considered Lord Shiva’s usual abode. The central circle surrounded by another circle depicting 16 Cobra snakes carvings, 32 Tridents and 62 Lotus buds and all these motifs multiple of 8( Eaight) are of Vedic significance. The great square, black basaltic pillar with the base and the capital of another similar pillar found in the deep crack of Dome found by Shri S. R. Roa, the Superintendent Archeological Department at Agra having report of Archeological Survey of India Vol- IV page 216 to 217 are the proof in respect of its identity as Shiva Temple. The symbol of Swastik, OM, Lotus, Snake, Peacock, Trident, Coconut, Pitcher, Mango Leafs, Banana Tree and recital of Sanskrit Stanzas now removed clandestinely by Mughal Ruler and carving of Koranic scripts in tiles pasted with Black cement filled up over Koranic script may further fortified the existence of the temple prior to its conversion. It so happened that one Aamlak (Used at the top of the golden coverage to the deity) has been recently discovered by the Superintendent of Archeological Department at Agra Near Cow Protection shelter, but the matter was subsided by the Government under pressure of appeasement policy, which was adopted from the time of Lord Auckland and his young Lieutenant Alexander Cunninghum by conceived indigenous scheme of misusing the provision of The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act,1904 read with The Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951, further replaced by The Ancient Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
The hidden Red Stone chamber below the Marble Stone Building of Taj Mahal
( formally the Shiva temple) now converted into Muslim Monuments by scaffolding 4 grave yards inside there on 3rd and 4th floor of the Marvel Stone Building, two of alleged Arjuman Bano Mumtaz Zilani and two of Shahjahan’s. The construction of these grave-yards on third and fourth chambers are themselves the perpetuation of the fraud committed by foreign Invaders but inspite the wooden doors were found 800 years old through Carbon Dating tests conducted in America in 1965, none of the intellectual, scholar, historian has risen to the occasion to teach correct history to children under their valuable rights of expression and speeches , which includes rights of information and being protected under Article 19 (1) (a), which is now having the statutory force under the provisions of Freedom of Information Act, 2002 coupled with their Rights of Conscience and Faith. The missing chapter of the world history, the misuse and destruction’s of our Vedic literature and creating the rift between Hindu and Muslims as a deep conspiracy committed by Lord Auckland in connivance with Lieutenant Alexander Cunninghum in 1842-1847 under the policy of “Divide and Rule” may not be allowed to be perpetuated after the dawn of our independence. The truth will not make us rich; but it will certainly make us free from false foundation of the slavery. This aspect of matter requires dedications towards Nation, sincerity in action and protection of Integrity of our country; for which Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, our Great Guru Govind Singh and Maharaja Maharana Pratap, Maharani Rani Laxmi Bai have sacrificed their life. It is said that the democracy can not survive and our Constitution can not work unless Indian citizens are not allowed to live beyond the bondage of slavery in order to built their moral character and inherent virtue by developing a scientific temper to strike towards excellence by exposing to falsehood beyond truth.
This is a massage communicated through the advocates, who have joined the profession not for doing any trade, business and as a moralistic professional but their consciences are pricked by visualising the injustices suffered by the children undertaking the historical teaching based on falsehood and deceptiveness, who are representing to the petitioner and also to those intervener namely Maha-Mandaleshwar Swami Vedvyasanand Saraswati Geeta Ashram International Charitable Trust having its registered office at Geeta Ashram, Post Swargashram, Rishikesh, Tehsil Kotdwar, District-Pauri Garhwal through its Sanchalak/manager Swami Sudharmanand Saraswati ji Maharaj and also to some registered society PURWAI, on whose behalf this appeal to save the monuments of Indian historical importance form further distrection by mismanagement may not be structure and the incident like Godhra Carnage and attack on Indian Parliament may not be attempted by the terrorist activities propagating on the basis of falsehood. The propriety of the Judicial institution in due discharge of its responsibility is dependent upon the factor that any party to the litigation may not be subjected to suffer adversely either directly or indirectly by any order passed by the court of law. There is a difference in passing a wrong judgement and in subservient the cause sponsor before the judicial institution after affiliation in the matter. The modus operandi may not be explicit by the same is always hidden inside the veracity of such order. For unjust cause, the court may not divest its extra ordinary jurisdiction to provide such individual striving for perpetuation of an unjust cause by the court of law.
The question arises that since the law cannot afford any relationship other than the truth, there is no favorite, which may be blunted by legal jugglery. It is said that the reason varies in its conclusions according to the idiosyncrasy of the individual personality by the reasoning should be built up for which an old scholastic logic stands for. This is like jingling of a child's toy. Thus a decision of a Judge usually determines, hat is reasonable belonging to the knowledge of law, which is likely to be decided rationally within the parameter of reason, which substitutes subjectivity by objectivity. The question arises as to whether the Hon’ble Courts are merely to act by overlooking the object to arrive at the truth is obliviously the role of the Hon’ble Court by ensuring that any material facts, which are brought on record may not resultant in the judgement by miscarriage of justice. The dignity of the ocean lies not in its furry capable of causing destruction but in the expansion of the gratitude by vast expansion of the receptivity.
The question arises as to whether a wrong decision rendered in absence of established norms of judicial parameter by adequate acceptance of the logic advanced by the party may not be tantamount the obliteration from the prescribed standards adhered with the judicial evaluation. There may be the error committed by the Judges in passing the order and judgement but if the provisions of the law itself are providing the impediment for the grant of relief claimed, even after recording such Ryder providing obstacle in carving out a judgement, the judgement shall be deemed to have been passed with extraneous consideration behind which, may also be the corruption. The Hon’ble Court while dealing may always keep the paradox of demonstrative style for imparting justice to fulfill the three ingredients of the elementary principles of natural justice in the mind. It has been held if the charges are levelled by imputation of character assassination, in such circumstances the Hon’ble Court while exercising the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India must always be susceptible for grant of the relief.
Fraud and justice never dealt together as fraud neither defends nor excuses any man. It is bound to expose by the afflux of time which is apparently visible in the given instance of passing the Judgement in the same matter, in such cases the consensus of the public is pricked by divulging to the process of recapturing the allegation levelled having impunity in exercise of our justice delivery system by the Constitutional Court.
Yogesh Kumar Saxena
Advocate, High Court
H.I.G.203, Preetam Nagar, Sulem sarai, Allahabad-211001
yogrekha@gmail.com, yogrekha@rediffmail.com, yogrekha@yahoo.co.in
Founder President- World Citizenship Group Foundation, Swami vevekanand world ethical foundation,
Executive Member- World Parliament Experiment conference 2008 at Bonn (germany),
Vice President- Geeta Asharam International Cheritable Trust, Rishikesh, Pauri Garhwal
Ex Vice President- Advocate’s Association, High Court, Allahabad
This Letter was written before he passed away on 4th December, 2007.
Mr. P.N. Oak. Austere by nature, a journalist by profession, a historian by hobby a researcher by accident and a freedom fighter by design Mr. Oak is one of his kind.
Born on March 2, 1917 at Indore (Cntral India) in a Maharashtrian Brahmin family he obtained his M.A. LLB Degrees from Mumbai University worked as a tutor in English at Fergussan College, Pune for a year and later joined the army got posted to Singapore at the age of 24.
He was one of the organizers of Indian national Army (INA) and a co-worker of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. After the end of world war II Oak walked back and hitch niped from Singapore to Dimapur in Assam.
From 1947 to 1974 his profession has been mainly journalism having worked on the editorial staff of Hindustan Times and The Statesman, as a class I officer in the Ministry of Information an Broadcasting (Govt. of India) and as Editor in American Embassy’s information service (USIS), all in New Delhi.
From 1963 onwards Mr. Oak has been putting out copious evidence through his research papers articles lectures slide chans and books proving that the historic mansions gardens, mosques, towers mansoleums and town ships ascribed to Moslems in India are in reality pre-moslem property belonging to and built by Hindu rulers.
Because of his hobby of visiting historic edifices it struck him as very odd that though muslims ruled India for over a thousand years ( 712 to 1857 A.D.) they are said to have raised mostly tombs and mosques, but no palaces. The other oddity in current history is that even native Indian ( Hindu) rulers for 7000 years from Pandavas to Prithviraj Chauhan are not known to have had many palaces of their own.
After years of concentrated thinking on those two enigmas it suddenly struck him that historic edifices throughout India tamtommed as tambs and mosques, could be captured, misused and misadvertised palaces and temples raised by Hindu rulers.
That inducd him to investigate further collect evidence and take a second harder look at historic edifices through out India which convinced him that his hypothesis was correct.
Thus, since he had discovered a great blunder in Indian history he wondered whether world history was faultless. And to his shock and surprise he discovered that world history too has numerous drawbacks.
For instance though there was no Islam before 622 A.D. none of the muslim countries throughout the world teaches any pre Islamic history of its region. Likewise no Christian country throughout the world teaches any pre-christian history.
These discoveries nudged him to found an organization which would teach the world of its (Pre-islamic and pre-christian) vedic Sanskrit heritage which held full sway throughout the world. He wrote several books braving the displeasure of his employers and the ruling Govt.
Charges of being communal were hurled at him. His books were banned from the library of parliament persecuted and prosecuted OAK faught his own case and was pronounced ‘not gulty’ by the court of law.
Supported by his family and friends he went ahead and founded the Institute for Rewriting Indian History which further grew to be The Institute for Rewriting world history.
Mr. OAK was invited for felicitation and lectures by various (N.G.O.) institutions and individuals. He traveled all over India and abroad and evoked great care from his readers and followers.
All his discoveries have so far remained unchallenged.
The Public Interest Petition/ Social Action litigation bearing Writ Petition No. 36818 of 2004 pending before Hon’ble Allahabad High court is sought to be transferred to the Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India in exercise of the powers Conferred with the Apex Court Under Article 139A of Constitution of India. This Writ Petition is filed in Public Interest on behalf of the Institute of re-writing Indian History through its Founder President, Shri P. N. Oak S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak R/o- Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune-411007 challenging the virus of The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 read with The Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951, replaced by The Ancient Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. This writ petition is further seeking the relief for appointing a facts finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Archeological Department regarding the historical blunder by recognising Taj Mahal as built by Shahjahan. This Writ Petition has not even dealt with by then Hon’ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. M. Katju and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sunil Ambwani , but referred to another Co-ordinate Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. B. S. Chauhan and Hon’ble Justice Mr. Dilip Gupta . Shri P. N. Oak, the Founder President, the Institute of re-writing Indian History was born on 2nd March 1917 at Indore and fought a battle of independence in associations with Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. He has got his faith report in our judicial institution for the protection of National Monuments of Taj Mahal, Agra Red Fort, Etmauddaula, Fatehpur Sikri from further destruction by adopting the device to hide Hindu religious symbols hidden inside two or three storey Red Stone Building Covered with the Earthly gardens from front side ;but fully exposed from its back side of Jamuna River side of this monument of great National Importance. This is now lying within the control of the Wakf Act,1995 by claiming the existence of Mosque inside these buildings. This is a glimpse of the picture coupled with preposition based on the evidence on the basis of the research work conducted by Sri P. N. Oak, Prof. R. Nath of Rajasthan University, Jaipur and further supported by Prof. Agam Prasad Mathur and Smt. Pratima Asthana, both of them are great historians and they are also former Vice- Chancellor of Agra University and Gorakhpur University respectively.
This is an endeavor by the great Indians, as history may not be thought to the children by deceptive mode of appeasement policy in favour of our so called Muslim Minority, which has resultant in division of the country and creating an insurgencies in Jammu and Kashmir and by inciting an attack on Parliament.
Advocates have to perform three fold duties at a time; i.e. duty to protect the legal interests of his Clients, to behave like the officers of the courts and also to protect the society from the atrocities committed in any form by the custodian of public Interest. The protection of the Fundamental Rights of Expression, Freedom Of Conscience, Faith and Religion of the Children undertaken their education in the subject of History with false identifications and ruthless invasions to their culture vedic heritage are one of the utmost importance to protect by Advocates by filing the Public Interest Litigation. Article 49 envisaged a duty to protect Ancient Monuments, which are repository to our tradition, culture, and architecture achievements. In this regard Shri P. N. Oak, through his research work conducted on the basis of historical evidences has proved that the glorious, marvelous seventh wonder of the world namely “ Taj Mahal” is a Hindu Temple/Palace constructed by Raja Parmarde Dev a Jat Ruler in 1155 to 1158 AD on behalf of Minister Salakahan, which remain in occupation of Raja Man Singh and thereafter taken over by Emperor Shahajahan from the possession of Raja Jai Singh in exchange of Government gratis on the death of Arjumanbano, Mumtaj Zeelani died on 17th June 1631 AD. The historical evidences in support of his research work are the admission of Mughal Emperor Shahajahan himself in his Badshahnama written by Shahjahan’s own court chronicler, Maula Abdul Hamid Lahori. The relevant description at Page no. 403 Vol.-1 of Badshanama admit the aforesaid revelation. The said document is now kept in National Archives, New Delhi. The second contemporary document is prince Aurangzabe’s letter written to his father in Persian language reporting the tomb-complex (Taj Mahal) being very old and ancient structure with cracks and leakage from it as early as in 1652 A.D. Which has been noticed by Archeological Survey of India. The third documentary evidences are Ex-Maharaja Jaipur Kapad Dwara collection bearing two Farmans written by Shahjahan on December 18, 1633 having modern exhibition no.R-176 and R-177 demanding Makrana Marble for Koranic grafts and the stone cutter for scaffolding Koranic scripts (after removing the Sanskrit verse disclosing the creation of the Shiva Temple). The entire structure is having octagonal chamber with spiritual meant for its tuning by beating Drums, blowing Crunch (Shanks), playing on Golden Thaal, Roaming the Bells , while worshiping in dedicated manner infront of 3 metre long Shivlingi. The remains of which have been discovered at Bateshwar Mela locality situated nearby to the location of Taj Mahal, which is described at Ingraphia Indica Vol-1 at Lucknow Museum. This crystal white Marvel Stone Shiva Temple was so alluring that Lord Shiva once enshrined in it has decided never to return to mount Khailash Parwat, which is considered Lord Shiva’s usual abode. The central circle surrounded by another circle depicting 16 Cobra snakes carvings, 32 Tridents and 62 Lotus buds and all these motifs multiple of 8( Eaight) are of Vedic significance. The great square, black basaltic pillar with the base and the capital of another similar pillar found in the deep crack of Dome found by Shri S. R. Roa, the Superintendent Archeological Department at Agra having report of Archeological Survey of India Vol- IV page 216 to 217 are the proof in respect of its identity as Shiva Temple. The symbol of Swastik, OM, Lotus, Snake, Peacock, Trident, Coconut, Pitcher, Mango Leafs, Banana Tree and recital of Sanskrit Stanzas now removed clandestinely by Mughal Ruler and carving of Koranic scripts in tiles pasted with Black cement filled up over Koranic script may further fortified the existence of the temple prior to its conversion. It so happened that one Aamlak (Used at the top of the golden coverage to the deity) has been recently discovered by the Superintendent of Archeological Department at Agra Near Cow Protection shelter, but the matter was subsided by the Government under pressure of appeasement policy, which was adopted from the time of Lord Auckland and his young Lieutenant Alexander Cunninghum by conceived indigenous scheme of misusing the provision of The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act,1904 read with The Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951, further replaced by The Ancient Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.
The hidden Red Stone chamber below the Marble Stone Building of Taj Mahal
( formally the Shiva temple) now converted into Muslim Monuments by scaffolding 4 grave yards inside there on 3rd and 4th floor of the Marvel Stone Building, two of alleged Arjuman Bano Mumtaz Zilani and two of Shahjahan’s. The construction of these grave-yards on third and fourth chambers are themselves the perpetuation of the fraud committed by foreign Invaders but inspite the wooden doors were found 800 years old through Carbon Dating tests conducted in America in 1965, none of the intellectual, scholar, historian has risen to the occasion to teach correct history to children under their valuable rights of expression and speeches , which includes rights of information and being protected under Article 19 (1) (a), which is now having the statutory force under the provisions of Freedom of Information Act, 2002 coupled with their Rights of Conscience and Faith. The missing chapter of the world history, the misuse and destruction’s of our Vedic literature and creating the rift between Hindu and Muslims as a deep conspiracy committed by Lord Auckland in connivance with Lieutenant Alexander Cunninghum in 1842-1847 under the policy of “Divide and Rule” may not be allowed to be perpetuated after the dawn of our independence. The truth will not make us rich; but it will certainly make us free from false foundation of the slavery. This aspect of matter requires dedications towards Nation, sincerity in action and protection of Integrity of our country; for which Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, our Great Guru Govind Singh and Maharaja Maharana Pratap, Maharani Rani Laxmi Bai have sacrificed their life. It is said that the democracy can not survive and our Constitution can not work unless Indian citizens are not allowed to live beyond the bondage of slavery in order to built their moral character and inherent virtue by developing a scientific temper to strike towards excellence by exposing to falsehood beyond truth.
This is a massage communicated through the advocates, who have joined the profession not for doing any trade, business and as a moralistic professional but their consciences are pricked by visualising the injustices suffered by the children undertaking the historical teaching based on falsehood and deceptiveness, who are representing to the petitioner and also to those intervener namely Maha-Mandaleshwar Swami Vedvyasanand Saraswati Geeta Ashram International Charitable Trust having its registered office at Geeta Ashram, Post Swargashram, Rishikesh, Tehsil Kotdwar, District-Pauri Garhwal through its Sanchalak/manager Swami Sudharmanand Saraswati ji Maharaj and also to some registered society PURWAI, on whose behalf this appeal to save the monuments of Indian historical importance form further distrection by mismanagement may not be structure and the incident like Godhra Carnage and attack on Indian Parliament may not be attempted by the terrorist activities propagating on the basis of falsehood. The propriety of the Judicial institution in due discharge of its responsibility is dependent upon the factor that any party to the litigation may not be subjected to suffer adversely either directly or indirectly by any order passed by the court of law. There is a difference in passing a wrong judgement and in subservient the cause sponsor before the judicial institution after affiliation in the matter. The modus operandi may not be explicit by the same is always hidden inside the veracity of such order. For unjust cause, the court may not divest its extra ordinary jurisdiction to provide such individual striving for perpetuation of an unjust cause by the court of law.
The question arises that since the law cannot afford any relationship other than the truth, there is no favorite, which may be blunted by legal jugglery. It is said that the reason varies in its conclusions according to the idiosyncrasy of the individual personality by the reasoning should be built up for which an old scholastic logic stands for. This is like jingling of a child's toy. Thus a decision of a Judge usually determines, hat is reasonable belonging to the knowledge of law, which is likely to be decided rationally within the parameter of reason, which substitutes subjectivity by objectivity. The question arises as to whether the Hon’ble Courts are merely to act by overlooking the object to arrive at the truth is obliviously the role of the Hon’ble Court by ensuring that any material facts, which are brought on record may not resultant in the judgement by miscarriage of justice. The dignity of the ocean lies not in its furry capable of causing destruction but in the expansion of the gratitude by vast expansion of the receptivity.
The question arises as to whether a wrong decision rendered in absence of established norms of judicial parameter by adequate acceptance of the logic advanced by the party may not be tantamount the obliteration from the prescribed standards adhered with the judicial evaluation. There may be the error committed by the Judges in passing the order and judgement but if the provisions of the law itself are providing the impediment for the grant of relief claimed, even after recording such Ryder providing obstacle in carving out a judgement, the judgement shall be deemed to have been passed with extraneous consideration behind which, may also be the corruption. The Hon’ble Court while dealing may always keep the paradox of demonstrative style for imparting justice to fulfill the three ingredients of the elementary principles of natural justice in the mind. It has been held if the charges are levelled by imputation of character assassination, in such circumstances the Hon’ble Court while exercising the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India must always be susceptible for grant of the relief.
Fraud and justice never dealt together as fraud neither defends nor excuses any man. It is bound to expose by the afflux of time which is apparently visible in the given instance of passing the Judgement in the same matter, in such cases the consensus of the public is pricked by divulging to the process of recapturing the allegation levelled having impunity in exercise of our justice delivery system by the Constitutional Court.
Yogesh Kumar Saxena
Advocate, High Court
H.I.G.203, Preetam Nagar, Sulem sarai, Allahabad-211001
yogrekha@gmail.com, yogrekha@rediffmail.com, yogrekha@yahoo.co.in
Founder President- World Citizenship Group Foundation, Swami vevekanand world ethical foundation,
Executive Member- World Parliament Experiment conference 2008 at Bonn (germany),
Vice President- Geeta Asharam International Cheritable Trust, Rishikesh, Pauri Garhwal
Ex Vice President- Advocate’s Association, High Court, Allahabad
No comments:
Post a Comment